![]() a Pad), select face or faces on the solid object, and use this script:įor o in Gui.Selection. If you need area of a sketch, convert one to a face: You can measure area of face, simply add Area attribute. The matrix of inertia is returned in the central coordinate system (G, Gx, Gy, Gz) where G is the centre of mass of the system and Gx, Gy, Gz the directions parallel to the X(1,0,0) Y(0,1,0) Z(0,0,1) directions of the absolute cartesian coordinate system. The products of inertia are denoted by Ixy, Ixz, Iyz. The moments of inertia are denoted by Ixx, Iyy, Izz. The coefficients of the matrix are the quadratic moments of inertia. MatrixOfInertia attribute output needs some explanation: matrix of inertia - add Shape.MatrixOfInertia attribute.Ĭone (height = 40 mm, radius = 30 mm) named "Revolution".center of mass - add Shape.CenterOfMass attribute,.volume - add Shape.Volume attribute to object,. ![]() Your new datum plane will automatically be attached to the base XZ plane (if that is the one you selected). Volume, center of mass and matrix of inertia Easiest way to do it is to unfold the 'Origin' object in the tree, select (click) the base plane you want, and then create your datum plane. The Body is self-contained and is intended to not reference items outside of itself. Ideally it is contained within a Part but as of this article this is not mandatory. Draw an arc (center at 0,0, radius 300) and horizontal line (length = 500) as in the image below. JBeginner Series, Part Design What is a Body and How is it used in FreeCAD The Body in FreeCAD is a type of container. section sketch at the end of trajectory.Ĭreate a new sketch on the XY plane. 2 Next pschindler Posts: 13 Joined: Mon 2:33 pm PartDesign Groove Issue (Cont.) by pschindler Mon 9:44 pm Hi everyone, I recently made a post on a PartDesign issue where a Groove feature failed. Using the FreeCAD Part Design Grove Tool on a cylinder.section sketch at the start of trajectory,.trajectory constructed from tangent segments, normal to section sketches,.Recipe for very simple manifold-like variable section pipe VariableSectionSweep = Part.Wire(traj).makePipeShell(sectionlist,makeSolid,isFrenet) # Create the 3D shape and set it to the Part object This Tutorial uses the Subtractive Groove from the Part Design Workbench to remove material from the Active Body. MyObject=("Part::Feature","VariableSectionSweep") # create a Part object into the active document Shape])]#at least one section is necessary Traj = Part.Wire(.Shape])#first wire is a trajectory # pick selected objects, where 1st selection is the trajectory and the 2nd and next are the sections to sweep Import Part, FreeCAD, math, PartGui, FreeCADGui What if you need variable section? Fortunately makePipeShell is able to handle many section wires. FreeCAD Offset Sketch - FreeCAD Sketch Tutorial - How To Offset Sketch - FreeCAD Offset Line AllVisuals4U 4.88K subscribers Subscribe 441 Share 23K views 2 years ago FreeCAD. I showed a sweep script which used two wires/sketches: first for trajectory and second for section. Thank you very much.Some engine parts like manifolds can be modelled as sweeps. I would highly appreciate any tips on how to fix the issue, as well as to gain an understanding of what causes this problem to avoid this issue in my actual part. However, as soon as the groove angle in the feature is increased beyond a certain threshold, the groove is not correctly computed. To complete a successful groove it must intersect some parts of the Body in which it is contained. The selected sketch is rotated around an axis and removes material that it intersects. I want to remove the geometry marked in red using the "Groove C" feature. The Subtractive Groove uses a Sketch to remove material from a Body. ![]() I created a similar (simplified) model to illustrate the problem. Unfortunately in my actual (more involved) model, the suggested approach does not fix the issue. The idea which resolved the issue was to change the rotation axis of a previous Revolution feature from "Horizontal sketch axis" to "Base Y axis", despite both options actually referring to the same axis. I used a very simplified model to illustrate my issue, which has successfully been resolved by following a suggestion from domad, see. I recently made a post on a PartDesign issue where a Groove feature failed. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |